One difference that is quantifiable, though, is that the F-80 is $17 more expensive than the Bionic Flat Top Buffer. The two brushes are very close, performance wise, so really it’s a matter of personal preference. As good as the F-80 is (and it is a very good brush) I think the Bionic Flat Top Buffer gives me an even more flawless finish. I actually prefer that slight give when blending in liquid and cream foundations. They may be a little less dense, but it’s hard to tell. The bristles on the Bionic Flat Top Buffer are actually softer than Sigmas F-80 (I know!), and they have a little bit more give when you bounce it against the skin. We are literally talking about centimeters, so for all intents and purposes, the two brushes look the same. The bristle on the Bionic Flat Top Buffer are about a centimeter or two longer than the F-80, so they fan out just the tiniest but farther than the F-80. The Bionic Flat Top Buffer is about a half inch shorter than the F-80, and that’s all from the handle. I know that many of you are wondering how the Bionic Flat Top Buffer compares to the Sigma F-80.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |